State v. Butcher
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Muscatine District Court. — Hon. C. M. Waterman, Judge. Defendant was tried in justice’s court on an information which accused him of “wilfully and unlawfully interrupting and disturbing a school,” and convicted. He appealed to the district court, and was again convicted. From the judgment rendered in the district court he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
After the verdict was returned in the district court, and before judgment was rendered, defendant filed a motion in arrest of judgment, the grounds of which were, in substance, that the information was insufficient to sustain a conviction. The motion was overruled, and leave given the state to amend the information, which was done. Judgment was therefore rendered on the verdict.
i. information: state amnsufarresté judgment. I. The body of the information, as originally filed, was as follows: “The above-named defendant is hereby aocused of the crime of wilfully and unlawf^Uy interrupting and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. McCormickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
- State v. ShawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- State v. DoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- State v. BrewerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. KuselWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. TophamUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. WassonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- State v. WhalenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- State v. MorrowSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.