Legal Opinion

State v. Whalen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 6, 1896PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Boone District Court. — Hon. D. R. Hind-man, Judge. The defendant was accused of the crime of seduction, tried, found guilty, and adjudged to be imprisoned in the state penitentiary at Ft. Madison, at hard labor, for the term of eighteen months. From that judgment he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

1 The crime of which the defendant was convicted, is charged in the indictment as follows: “The said John Whalen, on or about the twenty-ninth day of September, A. JD., 1894, in the county aforesaid, willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously did seduce and debauch Jennie McBirnie, an unmarried woman of previous chaste character, all contrary to, and in violation of law.” The appellant contends that this does not charge an offense, within the meaning of that part of section 4296, of the Code, which is as follows: “The indictment must contain: * * * (2) A statement of the facts constituting the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wright v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  2. State v. CurranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. State v. GroomeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Cowles v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Chambers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  2. State v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. State v. BabbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. State v. La GrangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API