Legal Opinion
GAF Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 3, 1981No. 73 Civ. 1893 (LWP)PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PIERCE, District Judge.
This action arises in a context in which it is asserted that for years the defendant Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) has dominated the amateur photographic industry, developing, manufacturing, and selling cameras, film, photofinishing equipment, supplies, and other related products, and providing photofinishing services. Until July 1977, when it ceased its production of film, chemicals, print paper, and slide and movie projectors, and ceased its sales of amateur still and movie cameras, and later, in April 1978, when it sold its photofinishing service…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Jack Faucett Associates, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Oahu Gas Service, Inc. v. Pacific Resources Inc., Gasco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Stanley McDonald Norman R. Hagfors, and Clayton Jensen v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- McLendon v. Continental Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- Argus Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.