State v. Herrera
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant was convicted of trafficking in heroin. His appeal raises issues as to: (1) sufficiency of the evidence and (2) judicial misconduct. Other issues listed in the docketing statement have not been briefed. They are deemed abandoned. State v. Vogenthaler, 89 N.M. 150, 548 P.2d 112 (Ct.App.1976).
Sufficiency of the Evidence
This issue is before us even though no motion for a directed verdict was made at the close of the evidence. State v. Lard, 86 N.M. 71, 519 P.2d 307 (Ct.App.1974).
Searching for heroin pursuant to a search warrant, officers searched the house and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. VogenthalerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. PaceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. BowersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. DonaldsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. ReeseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. SandovalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.