Legal Opinion

State v. Hansen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1987No. 21016, 860136PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal their separate convictions of possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute. U.C.A., 1953, § 58-37-8(l)(a)(ii) (1974 ed.). The trial court denied their pretrial motions to suppress the evidence seized during a search of their apartment. Both defendants contested the sufficiency of the affidavit used to procure the warrant. Because both defendants challenge the same search and make similar contentions on appeal, we consolidate the cases, sua sponte, and affirm both convictions.

On the morning of August 16, 1985, police officers armed with a search warrant entered…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  3. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. WorkmanUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. AshcraftUtah Supreme Court · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API