Legal Opinion
State v. Sedillo
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1966No. 8059PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LaFEL E. OMAN, Judge, Court of Appeals.
The appellant was charged by information with the crime of rape. He pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity. He was tried and the jury found him guilty. The trial court thereupon entered judgment and sentence, and appellant was committed to the New Mexico State Penitentiary.
He has appealed from the judgment and sentence, and he asserts two points upon which he relies for reversal.
His first point is that the trial court abused its discretion in personally questioning a clinical psychologist called as a witness by appellant. The appellant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. MarzanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United States v. BrandtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- State v. UptonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- Herman Krogmann and Emil Klauss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Feldon Jackson, Jr. v. John ShanksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- State v. HutchinsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. McDonaldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. CarltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. GuruleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.