Legal Opinion

State v. Pace

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1969No. 8579PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOISE, Justice.

In this appeal from a judgment and sentence of death following conviction of murder in the first degree, appellant argues six points of claimed reversible error in the trial.

Although presented by permission in a supplemental brief, we first consider point VI wherein it is argued that the procedure followed in qualifying the jury amounted to systematic exclusion of jurors who expressed scruples against the death penalty, resulting in a denial of due process under the doctrine of Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.2d 776 (1968).

The record…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Louisiana Ex Rel. Francis v. ResweberSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Boulden v. HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. DuffyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. HernandezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. RuffinoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. DayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API