Legal Opinion
United States v. City and County of San Francisco
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 15, 1953No. Civ. 27851-HPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, District Judge.
By the Raker Act of Dec. 19, 1913, P.L. 41, 63rd Cong., 38 Stat. 242, the United States granted to the City and County of San Francisco, California, certain public lands and rights-of-way over additional public lands in the Yosemite National Park and the Stanislaus National Forést. The Act was designed to and did enable the City to utilize the natural resources and facilities of Yosemite and Stanislaus in the construction of water reservoirs and electric power systems. The following conditions, among others, were attached to the grants: the City was to build and assign…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Sanitary District of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Sutton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Michele Portmann, Doing Business as Grafica, an Individual v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Gestuvo v. District Director of United States Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
- First National Bank v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2005
- United States v. CaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.