Michele Portmann, Doing Business as Grafica, an Individual v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
The primary issue in this appeal is whether the doctrine of equitable estoppel may be invoked against the United States Postal Service on the basis of representations made by a postal employee to a potential “Express Mail” customer. The district court, on cross motions for summary judgment, held that estoppel was unavailable against the federal government as a matter of law, and granted summary judgment in favor of the Postal Service on that basis. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
On January 15, 1980, plaintiff-appellant Michele Portmann, a free lance…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Automobile Club of Mich. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Franchise Tax Board v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,021 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Larry D. Blavin, D/B/A Providence Investment AdvisoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Sarah L. McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard SCHWEIKER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Jack H. Harrison and Frederick G. RixeyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.