Legal Opinion

Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided September 30, 2005No. CIV. 02-4126PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PIERSOL, Chief Judge.

After the Court allowed the Plaintiff Yankton Sioux Tribe (“the Tribe”) to file a Second Amended Complaint, Defendants filed a joint Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 180. The motion has been fully briefed and will be decided based upon the written record.

BACKGROUND

The original Complaint in this action contained two distinct types of claims: one alleging violations of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (“NAGPRA”), 25 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq., involving the inadvertent discovery of human remains; and one involving the transfer of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Brock v. Pierce CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. General Motors Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2007
  2. Wilson v. Department of InteriorDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023
  3. Wilson v. Department of InteriorDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023
  4. Wilson v. Department of InteriorDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023
  5. Wilson v. Department of InteriorDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API