Legal Opinion

Snow Mountain Pine Co. v. Maudlin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 8, 1987No. A8501-00567; CA A37762PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Snow Mountain filed a complaint with the Public Utility Commissioner asking the commissioner to compel CP National Corporation (CP), a regulated nongenerating electric power distributor, to purchase power from Snow Mountain Pine Company (Snow Mountain), a qualifying cogeneration facility, and to determine the rate to be paid for the power so purchased. The commissioner ordered CP to purchase power, approved a contract and set the purchase rate at CP’s “avoided cost” on file with the commissioner at the time of the publication of his order, September, 1984. 1

The circuit court affirmed the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Market Transport, Ltd. v. MaudlinOregon Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Smith Cogeneration Management, Inc. v. Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  3. Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. In Re East Georgia Cogeneration Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  5. Oregon Trail Electric Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Co-Gen Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API