Legal Opinion

Market Transport, Ltd. v. Maudlin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1986No. TC A8211-07250; CA A31966; SC S32079; SC S32085PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This is a weight-mile tax case. The Public Utility Commissioner (Commissioner) issued an order finding that plaintiff had acted as a common carrier with respect to the transport of unregulated goods for its customer, Fred Meyer, Inc., and was therefore responsible for paying a weight-mile tax pursuant to ORS 767.775 et seq. Plaintiff then sought review of the Commissioner’s order in the circuit court which, after reviewing the Commissioner’s order pursuant to ORS 756.580, held that plaintiff had acted only as a broker in the transactions and was therefore not responsible for the weight-mile…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. McCann v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Dickinson v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. TVKO v. HowlandOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Snow Mountain Pine Co. v. MaudlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance v. Amato Motors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  5. Keller v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API