Legal Opinion
Smith Cogeneration Management, Inc. v. Corp. Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 9, 1993No. 78041PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, Justice.
Three issues are presented: 1 1) whether Corporation Commission Order Nos. 358343 and 358913 violate federal or state law and whether the orders are supported by substantial evidence; 2) whether the Corporation Commission has subject matter jurisdiction to review reserve margins 2 and whether it exceeded its authority in doing so; and 3) whether the Corporation Commission’s Rule 58(h), codified as OAC 165:35 — 29—1(h), 3 is pre-empted by federal law. We find that: 1) Corporation Commission Order Nos. 358343 and 358913 do not violate federal or state law and that the orders are…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of New York v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Freehold Cogeneration Associates, L.P. v. Board Of Regulatory Commissioners Of The State Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Public Service Co. v. State Ex Rel. Corporation Commission Ex Rel. LovingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Oregon Trail Electric Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Co-Gen Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.