Rms Electronics, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Foed, Judge:
The Customs authorities at the Port of New York assessed duty on certain articles known as baluns, impedance matching couplers, or matching transformers at the rate of 12.5 per centum ad valorem under item 682.05, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by T.D. 68-9, which provides for transformers rated at less than 1 kVA.
Plaintiff, in challenging the assessment, contends the importations are dutiable at only 5 per centum ad valorem as television apparatus and parts, as provided for under item 685.20, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by T.D. 68-9.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. RMS Electronics, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
- Best Key Textiles Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Lockhart Textiles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020