C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, Judge:
The cases listed above, consolidated for the purpose of trial, involve certain steel castings which were classified as parts of furnaces under item 661.30, Tariff Schedules of the United States, and subject to duty at the rate of 19 per centum ad valorem.
Plaintiffs contend said merchandise is properly subject to classification as parts of conveyors as provided for in item 664.10, Tariff Schedules of the United States, which provides for duty at the rate of 10.5 per centum ad valorem. Alternatively, it is the position of plaintiffs that said merchandise consists of parts of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- F. L. Smidth & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Arthur J. Humphreys, Packard-Bell Electronics v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Costa International Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
3Cited by6 opinions
- Russell Stadelman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- A. J. Arango, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
- Rms Electronics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- American Schack Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.