Legal Opinion

E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 7, 1974No. 5538, C.A.D. 1114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MilleR, Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 70 Cust. Ct. 141, C.D. 4420,358 F. Supp. 1295 (1973), dismissing appellant’s claim for refund of duty and affirming the classification by the Customs Service under item 100.53 TSUS of nine imported female Holstein-Friesian bovines, each weighing 700 pounds or more and pregnant for the first time. We affirm.

The pertinent statutory provisions are as follows:

Tariff Schedules of the United States Schedule 1.

Part 1. — LIVE ANIMALS

Part 1 headnotes:

2. Unless the context of requires otherwise, each provision for named…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ameliotex, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  3. Rms Electronics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  4. De Laval Separator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API