Legal Opinion

Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1994No. 1315 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

Irwin A. Popowsky and the Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) petitions for review the decision of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) allowing Pennsylvania Power & Light Company (PP & L) to record as a regulatory asset the present costs of complying with a change in accounting standards and to recover those costs in future rates.

In December, 1990, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the body which sets accounting standards for businesses in the United States, issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 106. SFAS 106 changed the generally…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Pike County Light & Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Porter v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API