Commonwealth v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
We have before us two issues for determination in this administrative agency appeal: 1) Did the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Appellee herein, (PUC) deny due process of law to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant, (Commonwealth), and the Alliance for Consumer Protection, Intervening Appellant, (ACP) by not making available to the Commonwealth and ACP technical staff reports of PUC? and; 2) Did PUC err in amortizing expenses incurred due to tropical storm Agnes over a ten year period in determining revenue requirements for rate making purposes ?
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Braniff Airways, Incorporated v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- COM. EX REL. UNIFIED JUD. SYS. v. VartanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Connecticut Natural Gas Corp. v. Public Utilities Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Commonwealth v. VartanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Philipp Transit Lines, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.