Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
The Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) in a base rate case filed by Pennsylvania Power & Light Company (PP & L). The questions presented are (1) whether the PUC erred in permitting PP & L to charge current ratepayers for deferred prior period costs associated with a change in post-retirement benefits expense, where this Court previously held that recovery of these very costs would be prohibited by the rule against retroactive ratemaking; (2) whether the PUC’s decision to permit PP & L to charge…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- UGI Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCloskey v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Porter v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.