Legal Opinion

People v. Ehrhart

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 23, 1961No. Crim. 3178PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNS, J. pro tem. *

On June 8, 1960, a complaint was filed in the Justice Court for the Red Bluff Judicial District in the county of Tehama, charging respondents Bhrhart and McWilliams and one Philbrook with a violation of section 702 of the Welfare and Institutions Code (contributing to the delinquency of a minor), a misdemeanor.

A warrant was issued and the respondents and Philbrook were arrested. They furnished bail and were released. When they appeared before the justice court, Philbrook pleaded guilty to the offense charged and was certified to the juvenile court for further proceedings.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. People v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. People v. BaxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SOLANO CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. People v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. BeasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. People v. BeasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API