Legal Opinion

People v. Ellis

California Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1928No. Docket No. Crim. 3072PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This record presents but two questions: (1) May the People appeal under the facts here shown? and (2) if they may so appeal, does the information state a public offense over which the court below had jurisdiction? As we "have been led to the firm conclusion that both questions must be answered in the affirmative, they will be considered in the order stated.

On January 24, 1927, the district attorney of Solano County informed against the defendant, attempting to charge him with the offense of bigamy, using language here material as follows: “The said Henry "W. J. Ellis ... on or about the 27th…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. People v. HinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. People v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. In Re Application of HarronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. People v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. AndradeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API