Legal Opinion

People v. Hale

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1965No. Crim. 153Published

1Opinion of the Court

232 Cal.App.2d 112 (1965)

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

WALTER R. HALE, as County Auditor-Controller, etc., Defendant and Respondent.

Crim. No. 153.

California Court of Appeals. Fifth Dist.

Feb. 5, 1965.

Stanley Mosk and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorneys General, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Raymond M. Momboisse, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Adon V. Panattoni and Floyd V. Gibbert for Defendant and Respondent.

CONLEY, P. J.

Upon suggestion of the court, with the acquiescence of respective counsel, three phases of the prosecution of Walter R. Hale,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. People v. . GlenNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Greenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. KeenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. People v. . SextonNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API