Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Schrieber

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1946No. Civ. 13042PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, P J.

The plaintiff sued to quiet title to certain property in Santa Clara county which the defendants claim by virtue of a tax deed. The plaintiff had judgment and the trial court granted defendants’ motion for a new trial on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to justify the decision, that the decision was against law, and that error had occurred at the trial, by minute order on June 12, 1945, and by an order entered June 20 stating that it was granted on all grounds set forth and particularly on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence.

There have been three trials of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Campanella v. CampanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Jones v. SturzenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Menasha Wooden Ware Co. v. HarmonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Laist v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stone v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Estate of ReihsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Marosi v. J. W. Robinson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Weinmann v. Attorney GeneralCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API