Legal Opinion

Salt Lake County v. LABOR COMMISSION

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 30, 2009No. Case No. 20080265-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

1 Salt Lake County challenges the Utah Labor Commission's determination that the County was not entitled to a 15% reduction in compensation benefits it owed to John Wisner (Employee). As we determine that the Commission did not exceed its discretion in concluding that Employee did not willfully disobey any lifting restriction put in place by the County, we conclude that the County was not entitled to the 15% reduction.

BACKGROUND 1

12 On July 2, 2002, while working as a swimming pool maintenance specialist for the County, Employee was injured "by accident," Utah Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ae Clevite, Inc. v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  2. City of Las Animas v. MaupinColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Van Waters & Rogers v. WorkmanUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. McCulloch v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  5. Smit v. Geyer Detective Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Murray v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  2. Rojas v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API