Legal Opinion

McCulloch v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 2, 1942No. 15,047PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A PROCEEDING under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The Industrial Commission and the district court, in turn, found for claimant, but because of the latter's failure, as further found, to obey a reasonable safety rule, the compensation to be paid was reduced fifty per cent.

It appears that claimant was employed by defendant in error Pikes Peak Fuel Company, as a coal miner, and that in the course of such employment he received particles of coal in his left eye which resulted in permanent loss of the vision thereof. If there was a company rule requiring miners to wear goggles while performing…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bennett Properties Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  2. Salt Lake County v. LABOR COMMISSIONCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API