Legal Opinion

Van Waters & Rogers v. Workman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1985No. 20179PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

Plaintiffs Van Waters & Rogers and its insurance carrier, Hartford Insurance Company, seek to set aside an Industrial Commission order denying them a 15% reduction in worker’s compensation payable by them to defendant Kenneth R. Workman as a result of an industrial accident. Plaintiffs contend that Workman willfully failed to use safety goggles provided by his employer, Van Waters & Rogers, which resulted in his eye injury being worse than it would have otherwise been, and that the 15% reduction set out in U.C.A., 1953, § 35-1-14 of Utah’s Workers’ Compensation Act should have…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Utah Department of Administrative Services v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. STATE TAX COM'N v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lobdell Car Wheel Co. v. SubielskiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1924
  4. McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc. v. McCauleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. General American Tank Car Corp. v. BorchardtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Las Animas v. MaupinColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Taylor v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Salt Lake County v. LABOR COMMISSIONCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  4. Rojas v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  5. Trail Mountain Coal Co. v. KennerUtah Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API