Legal Opinion
James v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 31, 2002No. 00-2509(RMU)PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Transferring the Case to the Eastern District of Virginia
I. INTRODUCTION
This case arises from a complaint filed by Mr. Aaron James, Sr. (“the plaintiff’) alleging that his employer, Booz-Alen & Hamilton, Inc. (“the defendant”), discriminated against him on the basis of his race. The defendant moves the court to dismiss the action for improper venue, asserting that the alleged discriminatory act did not occur in the District of Columbia, that the employment records are not located in the District of Columbia, and that the plaintiff would not have worked…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lamont v. HaigCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- 2215 Fifth Street Associates, LP v. U-Haul International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Hsin Ten Enterprise USA, Inc. v. Clark EnterprisesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Donnell v. National Guard BureauDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Darby v. U.S. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Williams v. GEICO CORP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- James v. VERIZON SERVICES CORP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Pendleton v. MukaseyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Quarles v. General Investment & Development Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.