Legal Opinion
Hsin Ten Enterprise USA, Inc. v. Clark Enterprises
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 29, 2000No. 00 CIV. 5878(SAS)PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Hsin Ten Enterprise USA, Inc. (“Hsin Ten”) has sued Clark Enterprises and Clifford D. Clark, asserting claims of patent and trademark infringement, as well as state law claims. Defendants now move to dismiss the Amended Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Proce dure 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(3). For the foregoing reasons, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
In deciding a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2), a “court must assume all of the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- James v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Merck & Co. v. Mediplan Health Consulting, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Rovio Entertainment, Ltd. v. Allstar Vending, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Energy Brands Inc. v. Spiritual Brands, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Arma v. Buyseasons, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.