Legal Opinion

Bristol Hydraulic Co. v. Boyer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Erom the Elkhart Circuit- Court.

1Opinion of the Court

‘Worden, J.

This was an action by the appellee, against the appellants, to recover damages for erecting and maintaining a dam across a stream of water, and thereby backing the water upon the property and mill wheels of the plaintiff, situate above the dam of the defendants.

Demurrer to the complaint, for want of sufficient facts, overruled. Issue; trial; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

We will consider the points made in the brief of counsel for the appellants, for a reversal of the judgment.

It is conceded that the complaint is good, if some exhibits filed with it do not legitimately…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parker v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845
  2. Lowe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  3. Haight v. . PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Townsend v. KernsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. M. S. Huey Co. v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SlaughterIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Noble v. DavisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Steinke v. BentleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Browning v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API