Legal Opinion
Kane v. Chobani, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 20, 2014No. Case No.: 12-CV-02425-LHKPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Before the Court is Defendant Chobani, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Chobani”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint. ECF No. 158. Plaintiffs Katie Kane, Arianna Rosales, and Darla Booth (collectively “Plaintiffs”) oppose the motion, ECF No. 160. Defendant has replied. ECF No. 161. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Perkins v. Linkedin Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Moore v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Veera v. Banana Republic, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Backhaut v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Rupert v. BondDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.