Legal Opinion

Rupert v. Bond

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 22, 2014No. Case No. 12-cv-05292-BLFPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS; DENYING DEFENDANTS GILE R. DOWNES AND SCHULTE, ANDERSON, DOWNES, ARONSON & BITTNER, P.C.’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge

This case involves a family dispute over the Rupert siblings’ inheritance rights under their parents’ wills and trusts. Plaintiff William Trick Rupert brings this Second Amended Compliant (“SAC”) against a number of Defendants, including two of his siblings, several attorneys, and three law firms, alleging claims under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”)…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ali Warisuzzaman v. City of Phoenix, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
  2. Anbang Group Holdings Co. Limited v. ZhouDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  3. Arce v. LHM Dodge Ram AvondaleDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  4. Birch v. Family First Life, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
  5. Brooke v. Hatmaker Law CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API