Legal Opinion

Stark v. Turner

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided April 15, 1921Published

1Opinion of the Court

Matthews* J.

The plaintiff, claiming to be the legal owner and entitled to the immediate possession of the east half of let No. 1.07 of the Rose Hill Park Subdivision, Cincinnati, Hamilton county, Ohio, filed his petition in this ease to recover possession thereof from the defendant, and for 'mesne profits.

*314The defendant filed an answer and cross-petition, and in her cross-petition alleged, among other things, that the plaintiff’s testatrix in her life time, in contemplation of the defendant’s marriage, made a gift by parol of said real estate to the defendant, placed the defendant in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kurtz v. HibnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Dimond v. ManheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Brown v. HoagSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Horn v. LudingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Jorgenson v. JorgensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API