Legal Opinion
ICE Corp. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 7, 2006No. 05-4135-JARPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROBINSON, District Judge.
The Court now considers defendants Hamilton Sundstrand Inc. and Ratier-Fig-eac, S.A.’s motions to dismiss (Docs.15-16). Defendants contend that the first through fourth claims in the Complaint should be dismissed because plaintiff does not allege facts to support them. The motion is now fully briefed and the Court is prepared to rule. Defendants’ motions to dismiss are granted in part and denied in part as described more fully below.
1. Standard
Dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) is appropriate only if it is clear that no relief could be granted…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- William R. Gooley v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Poole v. County of OteroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Swimwear Solution, Inc. v. Orlando Bathing Suit, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Rezac Livestock Commission Co. v. Pinnacle BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2017
- Kansas State University v. PrinceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2009
- School-Link Technologies, Inc. v. Applied Resources, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Beacon Wireless Solutions, Inc. v. Garmin International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.