Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Washington
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 4, 1969No. Civ. A. 202-69PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM;
This case concerns plaintiff’s claim that there is a constitutional infirmity in the particular statute prescribing the *611requirement for employees of the District of Columbia Government to take an oath of office.
Shortly after plaintiff, Roma Stewart, presented her credentials, on or about January 3, 1969, for the position of substitute school teacher in the school system of the District of Columbia Government, she was notified by defendant William C. Boyd, Administrative Principal of Tri-School, that she was employed and hired, and indeed was the first person to be accepted under a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Aptheker v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. RobelSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Elfbrandt v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Whitehill v. ElkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United Federation of Postal Clerks v. BlountDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1971
- David Ozonoff v. William P. BerzakCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. VuitchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
- National Association of Letter Carriers v. BlountDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
- Robinson v. WashingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.