Elfbrandt v. Russell
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
This case, which involves questions concerning the constitutionality of an Arizona Act requiring an oath from state employees, has been here before. We vacated the judgment of the Arizona Supreme Court which had sustained the oath (94 Ariz. 1, 381 P. 2d 554) and remanded the cause for reconsideration in light of Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U. S. 360. See 378 U. S. 127. On reconsideration the Supreme Court of Arizona reinstated the original judgment. 97 Ariz. 140, 397 P. 2d 944. The case is here on certiorari. 382 U. S. 810.
The oath reads in conventional fashion as follows: 1
“I, (type or print…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by268 opinions
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
263 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.