Legal Opinion

Elfbrandt v. Russell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 18, 1966No. 656PublishedCited by 268 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

This case, which involves questions concerning the constitutionality of an Arizona Act requiring an oath from state employees, has been here before. We vacated the judgment of the Arizona Supreme Court which had sustained the oath (94 Ariz. 1, 381 P. 2d 554) and remanded the cause for reconsideration in light of Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U. S. 360. See 378 U. S. 127. On reconsideration the Supreme Court of Arizona reinstated the original judgment. 97 Ariz. 140, 397 P. 2d 944. The case is here on certiorari. 382 U. S. 810.

The oath reads in conventional fashion as follows: 1

“I, (type or print…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by268 opinions

  1. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

263 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API