Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 19, 2000No. AC 19394PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
Article IV (c) of General Statutes § 54-186 is a provision of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD)1 that affords a Connecticut prisoner the right to *3request a speedy trial in another state that has lodged a detainer against the prisoner. This habeas appeal con-*4cems two issues of law about the enforcement of that speedy trial right. One issue is whether the speedy trial right is enforceable without a showing of prejudice to the prisoner. The other issue is whether the speedy trial right with respect to out-of-state criminal proceedings automatically is tolled during…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PairCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- State v. ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Pinto v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Hutchings v. State Traffic Commn., No. X01 Cv 99 0160453s (Sep. 22, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Johnson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000