Legal Opinion

State v. Pair

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 7, 2010No. 95, September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.

This case calls upon us to construe the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (“IAD”), codified at Maryland Code (1999, 2008 Repl. Vol.), §§ 8-401 to 8-417 of the Correctional Services Article. 1 In particular, we are asked to determine whether the Circuit Court for Cecil County correctly interpreted the IAD to require dismissal of the criminal charges against Appellee, Caleb Micha Pair, on the ground that Appellant, the State of Maryland (“the State”), failed to comply with the 180-day speedy trial period set forth in the IAD. The State appealed the Circuit Court’s decision to the Court of…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Carine ReevesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
  2. Aleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Pitts v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. State v. CoaleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Aleman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API