United States v. Cummings
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON RECONSIDERATION
DRIBBEN, Judge:
The United States Court of Military Appeals vacated our earlier decision in this case and remanded it to this Court for further consideration in light of United States v. Palenius, 25 U.S.C.M.A. 222, 54 C.M.R. 549, 2 M.J. 86 (1977).1
Appellant was charged with one specification of larceny ($5,265.25), one specification of obstruction of justice, and one specification of forgery, in violation of Articles 121,134, and 123, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 934, and 923, respectively. Consistent with his pleas, he was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. FarleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
- United States v. GeibUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Rosenthal v. Citizens State Bank of CortezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. WeldonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979