Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Citizens State Bank of Cortez

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 8, 1954No. 17093PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

We shall designate the parties as they appeared in the trial court, where plaintiff in error was plaintiff, and defendant in error was defendant.

The record in this case is voluminous, but there is only one issue presented. A concise statement of the case is to be found in the following instruction to the jury:

“Statement of the Issues
“The plaintiff in this cause, Joe Rosenthal, alleges that on July 30, 1951, he deposited the sum of $2,500 in the Citizens Bank of Cortez, the defendant herein, at its banking house in Cortez, Colorado, by delivering the said amount of money to the Bank’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ausmus v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  2. Maloney v. JusselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  3. Schell v. KullhemSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Ryan Gulch Reservoir Co. v. SwartzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  5. Butler v. ChateauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hampton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  2. Scott v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. Pagano v. United Jersey BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. Ford Motor Company v. ConrardyColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. United States v. CummingsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API