Legal Opinion

Brigham v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1949No. 31119PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict of seven hundred fifty dollars for appellant on a tort claim against the city of Seattle. The question is whether the claim complies with statutory and charter provisions establishing prerequisites to the maintenance of such an action.

Rem. Rev. Stat. § 9478 [P.P.C. § 368-1], reads:

“Whenever a claim for damages sounding in tort against any city of the first class shall be presented to and filed with the city clerk or other proper officer of such city, in compliance with valid charter provisions of such city, such claim must contain,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Collins v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Wagner v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Duschaine v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Zettler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Barton v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nelson v. DunkinWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Renner v. City of MarysvilleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Humphrey Industries, Ltd. v. Clay Street Associates, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Renner v. City of MarysvilleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Renner v. City of MarysvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API