Legal Opinion

Fredericks v. Sault

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1898No. 2,358PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

— Appellant appeals from a judgment awarding appellee the possession of certain property, consisting of a piano, piano stool and cover, and damages for its detention. The only error assigned is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. A new. trial was asked because of excessive damages, that the finding is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law, and because of the admission of certain evidence and the rejection of certain evidence offered by appellant, which is set out in the motion. There was some evidence that the value of the piano, piano seat, and piano…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. MuggIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Muckenburg v. HollerIndiana Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  2. Shikany v. Salt Creek Transp. Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Wise v. WiseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  5. Kuhn v. KuhnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API