Shikany v. Salt Creek Transp. Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Blume, Justice.
This is an action, brought by the plaintiff against the defendant, to recover the sum of $2500, the value of one Saruc oriental rug, delivered by plaintiff to defendant, as a common carrier, for transportation from Casper to Sheridan, Wyoming, and subsequently lost. The case was tried to a jury. They returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $725. Judgment was entered thereon, and the defendant has appealed. The parties will be referred to as in the case below.
1. The defendant claims that it did not act as a common carrier in this particular case. It pleaded that…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Orange County Bank v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Magnin v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Allen v. PetrickMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Barker v. Lewis Storage & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Humphreys v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Edwards v. HarrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
- United States v. Vincent J. Ricciardi, United States of America v. Stanley M. UngerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Phelps v. Woodward Con. Co., N. Util.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1949
- Broyles v. BroylesWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- O'S Gold Seed Co. v. United Agri-Products Financial Services, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.