W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Louisville & N. R.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The controversy is between shippers of lumber and carriers in respect to construction of a rule in freight tariffs commonly known as the combination rule. An understanding of the point in dispute requires exposition of its 'historical setting.
From the principal sources of lumber supply in the south and southwest to the centers of consuming territory in the north are many rail routes served by numerous carriers. Shipments of lumber move either at through rates or at combination rates from points of origin to their destination. The through rate is what its name implies,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. McCaull CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. McCaull-Dinsmore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- McCrea v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Louisville & NR Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1952
- Rebel Motor Freight, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and Diamond-Bathurst, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Dant & Russell, Inc. v. Grays Harbor Exportation Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.