Legal Opinion

Dant & Russell, Inc. v. Grays Harbor Exportation Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 8, 1939No. 21137PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOWEN, District Judge.

The contracts all contain a strike clause providing that “ * * * the seller is not liable for delay or nonshipment or for delay or nondelivery if occasioned by * * * strikes, lockouts, or labor disturbances * * But the seller is given an option to make delayed delivery by the following contract provision: “Buyers agree to accept delayed shipment and/or delivery when occasioned by any of the aforementioned causes, if so required by the seller, provided the delay does not exceed thirty days.”

The contracts also contain the following language: “The terms of this contract are…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Lowrey v. HawaiiSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Black & Yates, Inc. v. Negros-Philippine Lumber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Chicago & W. I. R. v. Chicago & E. I. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joyce Wholesale Co. v. Northside Lumber & Manufacturers, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API