Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. McCaull Co
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
253 U.S. 97
40 S.Ct. 504
64 L.Ed. 801
CHICAGO, M. & ST. P. RY. CO.
v.
McCAULL-DINSMORE CO.
No. 628.
Argued and Submitted April 23, 1920.
Decided May 17, 1920.
Mr. O. W. Dynes, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.
Mr. J. O. P. Wheelwright, of Minneapolis, Minn., for respondent.
2Opinion of the Court · HolmesJustice Holmes
1
This is an action for the loss of grain belonging to the plaintiff and delivered on November 17, 1915, to the defendant, the petitioner, in Montana, for transportation to Omaha, Nebraska. The grain was shipped under the uniform bill of lading, part of the tariffs filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission, by which it was…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. McCaull-Dinsmore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. McCaull-Dinsmore Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- McCaull-Dinsmore Co. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1918
4Cited by92 opinions
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- St. Johns N. F. Shipping Corp. v. . S. A. Companhia Geral Commercial Do Rio De JaneiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Illinois Central Railroad v. CrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- The Ansaldo San Giorgio I v. Rheinstrom Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Thomas v. Barton Lodge II, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.