Legal Opinion

Rebel Motor Freight, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and Diamond-Bathurst, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 11, 1992No. 91-6091PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILBURN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Rebel Motor Freight, Inc. (“Rebel”) appeals the summary judgment granted by the district court to defendant Diamond-Bathurst, Inc., affirming the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC”) and dismissing Rebel’s petition for review. On appeal, the sole issue is whether plaintiff Rebel’s tariff publication practices, found to be unreasonable by the ICC, can abrogate the plain language of its published tariff which requires a higher tariff than was collected from defendant Diamond-Bathurst, Inc., thereby preventing Rebel from collecting alleged…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. The Coca-Cola Company v. The Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. Pinney Dock And Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. North Penn Transfer, Inc. v. Victaulic Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. KerriganDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1999
  3. CTC Communications Corp. v. Bell Atlantic Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1999
  4. Michigan Electric Transmission Co. v. Midland Cogeneration Venture, Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API