Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. M. Koppel Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 12, 1969No. 17354_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its August 2, 1967, order 1 directing, inter alia, the respondent, M. Koppel Company (the Company) to bargain upon request with the National Organization of Industrial Trade Unions (the Union). See 29 U.S.C. § 160(e). For reasons which hereinafter appear, we deny the petition without prejudice and remand the case to the Board for further proceedings.
The Company processes and sells textile remnants at a plant in Newark and a store in Westwood, New Jersey. In 1966, Koppel was the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. Flomatic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Process and Pollution Control Company, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Mapco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. Webb Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Altemose Construction Company and Energy Contracting Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Altemose Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975