Little v. Gallus
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
■ Appeal by the plaintiff, Adalbert P. Little, from a. judgment of-the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Monroe on the 7th. day of March, 1895, upon the decision of the .court, rendered after a trial át the Monroe Equity Term, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint upon the merits. ■ The action was brought to restrain the defendants from using or disclosing secrets of trade or manufacture which .'belonged to thp…
Read the full summary
■ Appeal by the plaintiff, Adalbert P. Little, from a. judgment of-the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Monroe on the 7th. day of March, 1895, upon the decision of the .court, rendered after a trial át the Monroe Equity Term, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint upon the merits. ■ The action was brought to restrain the defendants from using or disclosing secrets of trade or manufacture which .'belonged to thp plaintiff,: and which the defendants Gallus and Bostwick became-possessed of. while in his employ. : It Is alleged in the…
1Opinion of the Court
Adams, J.:
Hó specific findings of fact were made by the learned justicé before whom this cause was tried at the Special -Term, and it, therefore, becomes necessary to carefully éxamine the record in order to ascertain just what the evidence tends to establish. Such an examination discloses the fact that there is really but little conflict betw’een the testimony of the plaintiff and his witnesses and that of the defendants. ■ The latter, it is true, do not in express: terms admit all that is testified to by the former, but, nevertheless, the evidence *572which they furnish tends, as a whole, to…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Kaumagraph Co. v. . Stampagraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Byrne v. BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Witkop v. BoyceNew York Supreme Court · 1908
- Westervelt v. National Paper & Supply Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Boosing v. DormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.