Boosing v. Dorman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Daniel Boosing, from -a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Erie on the 25th day of July, 1911, upon the report of a referee dismissing the complaint upon the merits. Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of Kenefick, Referee.
1Opinion of the Court
The following is the opinion of the referee:
Daniel J. Kenefick, Referee:
Upon the facts found in my decision there arises for determination the single question as to whether, in the absence of an express contract, a salesman who, while , in the employ of his master, and through- such employment, learns the names and addresses of his master’s customers and the individual preferences, traits and characteristics of such customers and the dates on which they are accustomed to buy, and the kind and grade of goods which they are in the habit of purchasing, and the promptitude with which they pay…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- H. W. Gossard Co. v. CrosbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Witkop v. BoyceNew York Supreme Court · 1908
- Little v. GallusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Kavanaugh v. Commonwealth Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by30 opinions
- Leo Silfen, Inc. v. CreamNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Continental Car-Na-Var Corp. v. MoseleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Town & Country House & Home Service, Inc. v. NewberyNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Town & Country House & Homes Service, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- S. W. Scott & Co. v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.