Legal Opinion
Stephenson v. Cox
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 23, 2002No. Civil Action 00-1921(RMU)PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Thomas Stephenson, is suing United States Park Police Officers John Cox and William Mossburg (collectively “the defendants”) for damages caused by their arrest and detention of him. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants arrested and searched him without probable cause and therefore violated the plaintiffs Fourth Amendment right to be free from illegal search, seizure, and arrest. The defendants move to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. BenderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Jerome D. Jackson v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & DunnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, Appellants/cross-Appellees, Nathaniel McQueen Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Weil v. SeltzerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
3Cited by117 opinions
- Hopkins v. Women's Division, General Board of Global MinistriesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Buggs v. PowellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Hopkins v. Women's Division, General Board of Global MinistriesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Atlantigas Corp. v. Nisource, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Singh v. United States House of Representatives, Committee on Ways & MeansDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.